<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pete Ware &#187; citizens united</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peteware.com/tag/citizens-united/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peteware.com</link>
	<description>Tech, Politics, and NYC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 02:14:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme court ruling on campaign finance</title>
		<link>http://peteware.com/2010/01/supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-finance/</link>
		<comments>http://peteware.com/2010/01/supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-finance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[campaign finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supreme court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peteware.com/?p=803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matthew Yglesias points out at that the Citizens United decision may have some pretty painful consequences to our politics: Bank of America, for example, dedicates $2.3 billion to marketing in 2008 so it’s clear that they’ve got the budget to mount a $100 million series of scathing attacks on a Senator who pisses them off [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2010/01/money-for-nothing-and-votes-for-free.php">Matthew Yglesias</a> points out at that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/23/us/politics/23scotus.html">Citizens United decision</a> may have some pretty painful consequences to our politics:</p>

<blockquote>
Bank of America, for example, dedicates $2.3 billion to marketing in 2008 so it’s clear that they’ve got the budget to mount a $100 million series of scathing attacks on a Senator who pisses them off and basically laugh that off (and note that in 2004 total spending on Senate campaigns was just $400 million).
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://peteware.com/2010/01/supreme-court-ruling-on-campaign-finance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
